Mali vs Spain: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mali
- Spain
How they compare
Mali currently reports 24,966 t against 22,352 t in Spain, a difference of 2,614 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.
Mali ranks 31st and Spain ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,683 t | 24,391 t | 21,708 t | Spain |
| 1970s | 3,244 t | 32,066 t | 28,822 t | Spain |
| 1980s | 3,908 t | 36,845 t | 32,937 t | Spain |
| 1990s | 6,777 t | 34,917 t | 28,140 t | Spain |
| 2000s | 12,516 t | 34,525 t | 22,010 t | Spain |
| 2010s | 20,290 t | 34,555 t | 14,266 t | Spain |
| 2020s | 24,078 t | 37,611 t | 13,533 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Mali or Spain?
- Mali, at 24,966 t against 22,352 t in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Mali and Spain?
- 2,614 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Spain rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Mali ranks 31st and Spain ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).