Mauritius vs Suriname: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mauritius
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 135.88 t against 89.91 t in Mauritius, a difference of 45.97 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.5 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 162nd and Suriname ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 104.03 t | 56.33 t | 47.7 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 123.55 t | 82.1 t | 41.45 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 110.58 t | 114.23 t | 3.65 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 98.2 t | 122.85 t | 24.65 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 95.06 t | 119.61 t | 24.55 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 89.36 t | 171.18 t | 81.82 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 80.51 t | 146.55 t | 66.04 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Mauritius or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 135.88 t against 89.91 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Mauritius and Suriname?
- 45.97 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Suriname rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Mauritius ranks 162nd and Suriname ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).