Mexico vs Russian Federation: Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mexico
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 480,966 t against 88,440 t in Mexico, a difference of 392,526 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 5.4 times Mexico's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 185 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54,896 t | 268,540 t | 213,645 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 65,053 t | 261,670 t | 196,617 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 70,608 t | 317,955 t | 247,347 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 84,110 t | 448,448 t | 364,338 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus, Mexico or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 480,966 t against 88,440 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus between Mexico and Russian Federation?
- 392,526 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Russian Federation rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Mexico ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).