Montenegro vs Vanuatu: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Montenegro
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 25.83 t against 11.45 t in Montenegro, a difference of 14.38 t.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 2.3 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 172nd and Vanuatu ranks 170th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 131.85 t | 13.64 t | 118.21 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 47.66 t | 16.04 t | 31.61 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 11.15 t | 21.42 t | 10.27 t | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Montenegro or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 25.83 t against 11.45 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Montenegro and Vanuatu?
- 14.38 t, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Vanuatu?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Vanuatu rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Montenegro ranks 172nd and Vanuatu ranks 170th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).