Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
618,259 t
in 2023
Russian Federation
480,966 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
6th
Russian Federation rank
5th

Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Russian Federation
200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 618,259 t against 480,966 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 137,293 t.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 1.3 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 6th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 29 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 304,865 t 268,540 t 36,324 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 381,305 t 261,670 t 119,634 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 517,381 t 317,955 t 199,426 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 599,378 t 448,448 t 150,930 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Russian Federation?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 618,259 t against 480,966 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation?
137,293 t, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 6th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/russian-federation-2/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).