Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Serbia: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 4,793 t against 4,547 t in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 246 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 79th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,118 t | 5,259 t | 141.05 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 4,709 t | 5,646 t | 937.9 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 4,423 t | 4,853 t | 429.53 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 4,793 t against 4,547 t in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Serbia?
- 246 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Serbia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 81st and Serbia ranks 79th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).