Nigeria vs Poland: Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Nigeria
- Poland
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 59,175 t against 54,158 t in Poland, a difference of 5,017 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Nigeria ranks 15th and Poland ranks 16th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,363 t | 49,625 t | 31,262 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 22,400 t | 57,744 t | 35,343 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 32,854 t | 61,662 t | 28,808 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 44,802 t | 55,818 t | 11,016 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 64,581 t | 46,632 t | 17,949 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 59,360 t | 44,418 t | 14,942 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 59,955 t | 53,723 t | 6,231 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus, Nigeria or Poland?
- Nigeria, at 59,175 t against 54,158 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus between Nigeria and Poland?
- 5,017 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Poland rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland phosphorus?
- Nigeria ranks 15th and Poland ranks 16th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).