Nigeria vs Viet Nam: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Nigeria
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 59,175 t against 45,842 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 13,333 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.3 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Nigeria ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 186 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,363 t | 7,750 t | 10,613 t | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 22,400 t | 8,101 t | 14,299 t | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 32,854 t | 7,596 t | 25,258 t | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 44,802 t | 9,790 t | 35,012 t | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 64,581 t | 20,188 t | 44,393 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 59,360 t | 34,380 t | 24,980 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 59,955 t | 44,145 t | 15,810 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Nigeria or Viet Nam?
- Nigeria, at 59,175 t against 45,842 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Nigeria and Viet Nam?
- 13,333 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Viet Nam rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Nigeria ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).