North Macedonia vs Uruguay: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- North Macedonia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 622.79 t against 502.34 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 120.45 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 125th and Uruguay ranks 124th of 185 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 846.15 t | 1,051 t | 204.64 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 675.21 t | 841.61 t | 166.41 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 585.5 t | 846.22 t | 260.72 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 522.73 t | 841.5 t | 318.77 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, North Macedonia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 622.79 t against 502.34 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 120.45 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Uruguay rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- North Macedonia ranks 125th and Uruguay ranks 124th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).