Papua New Guinea vs Uruguay: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Uruguay
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 628.06 t against 622.79 t in Uruguay, a difference of 5.27 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd and Uruguay ranks 124th of 186 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 177.78 t | 1,121 t | 943.1 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 238.44 t | 960.8 t | 722.37 t | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 319.81 t | 1,020 t | 699.69 t | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 406.53 t | 1,036 t | 629.36 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 533.41 t | 841.61 t | 308.2 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 644.8 t | 846.22 t | 201.42 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 656.4 t | 841.5 t | 185.11 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Papua New Guinea or Uruguay?
- Papua New Guinea, at 628.06 t against 622.79 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Papua New Guinea and Uruguay?
- 5.27 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Uruguay rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd and Uruguay ranks 124th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).