Peru vs Senegal: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Peru
- Senegal
How they compare
Peru currently reports 13,080 t against 12,413 t in Senegal, a difference of 667 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.
Peru ranks 48th and Senegal ranks 50th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 5 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,600 t | 4,746 t | 1,145 t | Senegal |
| 1970s | 4,657 t | 4,819 t | 162.03 t | Senegal |
| 1980s | 5,998 t | 5,187 t | 811.32 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 6,854 t | 5,261 t | 1,592 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 8,521 t | 5,525 t | 2,996 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 10,499 t | 7,472 t | 3,027 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 13,111 t | 11,220 t | 1,891 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Peru or Senegal?
- Peru, at 13,080 t against 12,413 t in Senegal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Peru and Senegal?
- 667 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Senegal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Senegal rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Peru ranks 48th and Senegal ranks 50th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).