Philippines vs Yugoslav SFR: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Philippines
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 18,121 t against 16,656 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 1,465 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 33rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 35th of 185 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,167 t | 10,847 t | 7,680 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 4,926 t | 14,753 t | 9,827 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 8,559 t | 15,771 t | 7,212 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 10,888 t | 14,223 t | 3,335 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Philippines or Yugoslav SFR?
- Philippines, at 18,121 t against 16,656 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Philippines and Yugoslav SFR?
- 1,465 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Philippines and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Philippines ranks 33rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 35th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).