Polynesia vs Tonga: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Polynesia
- Tonga
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 20.99 t against 9.1 t in Tonga, a difference of 11.89 t.
That makes Polynesia's figure about 2.3 times Tonga's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 171st and Tonga ranks 174th of 201 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.97 t | 13.2 t | 10.77 t | Polynesia |
| 1970s | 24.07 t | 13.04 t | 11.03 t | Polynesia |
| 1980s | 25.8 t | 12.56 t | 13.24 t | Polynesia |
| 1990s | 22.7 t | 11.76 t | 10.94 t | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 17.06 t | 6.55 t | 10.51 t | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 22.7 t | 7.99 t | 14.71 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 21.27 t | 9.12 t | 12.15 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Polynesia or Tonga?
- Polynesia, at 20.99 t against 9.1 t in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Polynesia and Tonga?
- 11.89 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Tonga rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Polynesia ranks 171st and Tonga ranks 174th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).