Puerto Rico vs Suriname: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Puerto Rico
- Suriname
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 141.16 t against 135.88 t in Suriname, a difference of 5.28 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 147th and Suriname ranks 148th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 225.75 t | 56.33 t | 169.42 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 131.02 t | 82.1 t | 48.91 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 82.89 t | 114.23 t | 31.34 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 46.56 t | 122.85 t | 76.3 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 65.37 t | 119.61 t | 54.24 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 113.6 t | 171.18 t | 57.58 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 131.52 t | 146.55 t | 15.03 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Puerto Rico or Suriname?
- Puerto Rico, at 141.16 t against 135.88 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Puerto Rico and Suriname?
- 5.28 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Puerto Rico and Suriname rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Puerto Rico ranks 147th and Suriname ranks 148th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).