Republic of Korea vs Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Republic of Korea
- Sudan
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 9,574 t against 9,350 t in Sudan, a difference of 224 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 55th and Sudan ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10,368 t | 12,067 t | 1,699 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 9,725 t | 11,617 t | 1,892 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Republic of Korea or Sudan?
- Republic of Korea, at 9,574 t against 9,350 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Republic of Korea and Sudan?
- 224 t, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Korea and Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Republic of Korea ranks 55th and Sudan ranks 56th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).