Rwanda vs South Sudan, Republic of: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Rwanda
- South Sudan, Republic of
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 2,472 t against 2,452 t in South Sudan, Republic of, a difference of 20 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 93rd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 94th of 185 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | South Sudan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,556 t | 2,173 t | 382.9 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 2,520 t | 2,333 t | 186.88 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Rwanda or South Sudan, Republic of?
- Rwanda, at 2,472 t against 2,452 t in South Sudan, Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Rwanda and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 20 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and South Sudan, Republic of rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Rwanda ranks 93rd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 94th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).