Sao Tome and Principe vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus

Sao Tome and Principe
8.99 t
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
7.9 t
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
162nd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
164th

Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
051015196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 8.99 t against 7.9 t in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 1.09 t.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 162nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 164th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 3 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 1.47 t 12.54 t 11.07 t Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1970s 1.72 t 10.94 t 9.21 t Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 2.29 t 9.25 t 6.97 t Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 5.71 t 6.49 t 0.7743 t Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 8.63 t 4.91 t 3.72 t Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 8.85 t 6.42 t 2.43 t Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 10.28 t 7.76 t 2.53 t Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Sao Tome and Principe or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 8.99 t against 7.9 t in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
1.09 t, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 162nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 164th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus/sao-tome-and-principe/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-phosphorus/sao-tome-and-principe/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).