Saudi Arabia vs Turkmenistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 6,488 t against 6,171 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 317 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 68th and Turkmenistan ranks 71st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,242 t | 5,861 t | 2,380 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 8,251 t | 7,715 t | 536.04 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 7,805 t | 7,875 t | 70.13 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 6,147 t | 8,691 t | 2,544 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Saudi Arabia or Turkmenistan?
- Saudi Arabia, at 6,488 t against 6,171 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Saudi Arabia and Turkmenistan?
- 317 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Turkmenistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 68th and Turkmenistan ranks 71st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).