Slovakia vs Sudan (former): Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Slovakia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 10,962 t against 10,830 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 132 t.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Slovakia ranks 51st and Sudan (former) ranks 52nd of 186 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,993 t | 11,524 t | 3,531 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 6,080 t | 12,427 t | 6,347 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 5,865 t | 10,147 t | 4,281 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Slovakia or Sudan (former)?
- Slovakia, at 10,962 t against 10,830 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Slovakia and Sudan (former)?
- 132 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Sudan (former)?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Slovakia and Sudan (former) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Slovakia ranks 51st and Sudan (former) ranks 52nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).