Sudan (former) vs Uganda: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sudan (former)
- Uganda
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 10,830 t against 10,688 t in Uganda, a difference of 142 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
Sudan (former) ranks 52nd and Uganda ranks 53rd of 185 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Sudan (former) averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan (former) | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,515 t | 2,823 t | 14,692 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1970s | 15,707 t | 4,303 t | 11,404 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1980s | 12,141 t | 6,830 t | 5,311 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 11,736 t | 8,421 t | 3,315 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 12,427 t | 10,052 t | 2,375 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 10,147 t | 11,262 t | 1,116 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Sudan (former) or Uganda?
- Sudan (former), at 10,830 t against 10,688 t in Uganda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Sudan (former) and Uganda?
- 142 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Uganda?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Sudan (former) and Uganda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Sudan (former) ranks 52nd and Uganda ranks 53rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).