Sudan vs Uganda: Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus
Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sudan
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 10,688 t against 9,350 t in Sudan, a difference of 1,338 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Uganda ahead.
Sudan ranks 59th and Uganda ranks 56th of 201 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12,067 t | 10,704 t | 1,363 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 11,617 t | 11,079 t | 537.82 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus, Sudan or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 10,688 t against 9,350 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus between Sudan and Uganda?
- 1,338 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Uganda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Uganda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland phosphorus?
- Sudan ranks 59th and Uganda ranks 56th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).