Austria vs Belarus: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Austria
- Belarus
How they compare
Austria currently reports 63.75 kg/ha against 59.97 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 3.78 kg/ha.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 16th and Belarus ranks 19th of 201 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.46 kg/ha | 38.82 kg/ha | 10.65 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2000s | 50.53 kg/ha | 47.18 kg/ha | 3.35 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2010s | 55.16 kg/ha | 55.1 kg/ha | 0.0599 kg/ha | Austria |
| 2020s | 63.56 kg/ha | 58.73 kg/ha | 4.83 kg/ha | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Austria or Belarus?
- Austria, at 63.75 kg/ha against 59.97 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Austria and Belarus?
- 3.78 kg/ha, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Belarus rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Austria ranks 16th and Belarus ranks 19th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).