Azerbaijan vs Ethiopia: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 39.86 kg/ha against 38.75 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 1.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 39th and Ethiopia ranks 36th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.36 kg/ha | 15.26 kg/ha | 4.1 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 29.27 kg/ha | 18.12 kg/ha | 11.15 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 31.29 kg/ha | 30.47 kg/ha | 0.8121 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 37.93 kg/ha | 39.35 kg/ha | 1.41 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 39.86 kg/ha against 38.75 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and Ethiopia?
- 1.11 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Ethiopia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 39th and Ethiopia ranks 36th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).