Azerbaijan vs Suriname: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Suriname
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 38.75 kg/ha against 37.72 kg/ha in Suriname, a difference of 1.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Suriname ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 39th and Suriname ranks 41st of 186 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.83 kg/ha | 29.63 kg/ha | 9.8 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2000s | 29.27 kg/ha | 33.6 kg/ha | 4.33 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 31.29 kg/ha | 41.93 kg/ha | 10.64 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 37.93 kg/ha | 38.4 kg/ha | 0.4635 kg/ha | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or Suriname?
- Azerbaijan, at 38.75 kg/ha against 37.72 kg/ha in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and Suriname?
- 1.03 kg/ha, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Suriname rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 39th and Suriname ranks 41st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).