Barbados vs Eritrea: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Barbados
- Eritrea
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 13.01 kg/ha against 12.72 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 117th and Eritrea ranks 119th of 185 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.59 kg/ha | 11.53 kg/ha | 2.07 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2000s | 13.84 kg/ha | 10.64 kg/ha | 3.2 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2010s | 12.94 kg/ha | 12.63 kg/ha | 0.3082 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2020s | 13.25 kg/ha | 12.72 kg/ha | 0.5294 kg/ha | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Barbados or Eritrea?
- Barbados, at 13.01 kg/ha against 12.72 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Barbados and Eritrea?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Eritrea rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Barbados ranks 117th and Eritrea ranks 119th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).