Belgium vs Egypt: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belgium
- Egypt
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 112.65 kg/ha against 109.37 kg/ha in Egypt, a difference of 3.28 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Egypt ahead.
Belgium ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 2nd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Egypt in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.13 kg/ha | 109.41 kg/ha | 13.28 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 2010s | 103.35 kg/ha | 107.84 kg/ha | 4.49 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 2020s | 108.8 kg/ha | 108.02 kg/ha | 0.7825 kg/ha | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Belgium or Egypt?
- Belgium, at 112.65 kg/ha against 109.37 kg/ha in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Belgium and Egypt?
- 3.28 kg/ha, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Egypt?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Egypt rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belgium ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 2nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).