Belize vs Ghana: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belize
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 18.15 kg/ha against 17.72 kg/ha in Belize, a difference of 0.43 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 95th and Ghana ranks 92nd of 185 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.85 kg/ha | 3.78 kg/ha | 5.06 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1970s | 11.13 kg/ha | 4.52 kg/ha | 6.62 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1980s | 10.81 kg/ha | 5.19 kg/ha | 5.62 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1990s | 10.59 kg/ha | 7.41 kg/ha | 3.18 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2000s | 13.27 kg/ha | 8.29 kg/ha | 4.98 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2010s | 15.21 kg/ha | 12.3 kg/ha | 2.91 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2020s | 17.27 kg/ha | 16.54 kg/ha | 0.7253 kg/ha | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Belize or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 18.15 kg/ha against 17.72 kg/ha in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Belize and Ghana?
- 0.43 kg/ha, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Ghana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Ghana rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belize ranks 95th and Ghana ranks 92nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).