Belize vs Kazakhstan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belize
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Belize currently reports 17.72 kg/ha against 17.4 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.32 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Belize ranks 95th and Kazakhstan ranks 96th of 185 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.93 kg/ha | 14.45 kg/ha | 3.52 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 13.27 kg/ha | 17.76 kg/ha | 4.48 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 15.21 kg/ha | 18.66 kg/ha | 3.45 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 17.27 kg/ha | 19.37 kg/ha | 2.1 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Belize or Kazakhstan?
- Belize, at 17.72 kg/ha against 17.4 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Belize and Kazakhstan?
- 0.32 kg/ha, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Kazakhstan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belize ranks 95th and Kazakhstan ranks 96th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).