Burundi vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Burundi
- South Sudan
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 10.01 kg/ha against 9.92 kg/ha in South Sudan, a difference of 0.09 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 126th and South Sudan ranks 128th of 186 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.69 kg/ha | 8.76 kg/ha | 0.9371 kg/ha | Burundi |
| 2020s | 9.73 kg/ha | 9.3 kg/ha | 0.4232 kg/ha | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Burundi or South Sudan?
- Burundi, at 10.01 kg/ha against 9.92 kg/ha in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Burundi and South Sudan?
- 0.09 kg/ha, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 126th and South Sudan ranks 128th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).