Cambodia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Cambodia
39.99 kg/ha
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
39.01 kg/ha
in 2023
Cambodia rank
35th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
37th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Cambodia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 39.99 kg/ha against 39.01 kg/ha in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.98 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Cambodia ranks 35th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 37th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 3 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 10.85 kg/ha 26.93 kg/ha 16.08 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1970s 10.97 kg/ha 25.01 kg/ha 14.04 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 11.88 kg/ha 20.28 kg/ha 8.41 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 15.41 kg/ha 22.23 kg/ha 6.82 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 23.65 kg/ha 23.41 kg/ha 0.2434 kg/ha Cambodia
2010s 32.49 kg/ha 30.62 kg/ha 1.87 kg/ha Cambodia
2020s 37.88 kg/ha 37.85 kg/ha 0.0334 kg/ha Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Cambodia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Cambodia, at 39.99 kg/ha against 39.01 kg/ha in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Cambodia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.98 kg/ha, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Cambodia ranks 35th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 37th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/cambodia/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/cambodia/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Cambodia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).