Central Asia vs Luxembourg: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Central Asia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 69.22 kg/ha against 29.18 kg/ha in Central Asia, a difference of 40.04 kg/ha.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.4 times Central Asia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 11th and Luxembourg ranks 13th of 29 groups.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.47 kg/ha | 65.63 kg/ha | 38.16 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 28.78 kg/ha | 68.35 kg/ha | 39.58 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 30.69 kg/ha | 73.27 kg/ha | 42.57 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Central Asia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 69.22 kg/ha against 29.18 kg/ha in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Central Asia and Luxembourg?
- 40.04 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Luxembourg rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Central Asia ranks 11th and Luxembourg ranks 13th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).