China, mainland vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

China, mainland
53.25 kg/ha
in 2023
Small island developing states (SIDS)
16.06 kg/ha
in 2023
China, mainland rank
25th
Small island developing states (SIDS) rank
11th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • China, mainland
  • Small island developing states (SIDS)
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 53.25 kg/ha against 16.06 kg/ha in Small island developing states (SIDS), a difference of 37.19 kg/ha.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 3.3 times Small island developing states (SIDS)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, mainland has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 25th and Small island developing states (SIDS) ranks 11th of 186 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Small island developing states (SIDS) Difference Ahead
1960s 24.37 kg/ha 11.62 kg/ha 12.74 kg/ha China, mainland
1970s 32.82 kg/ha 13.12 kg/ha 19.7 kg/ha China, mainland
1980s 40.65 kg/ha 14.17 kg/ha 26.48 kg/ha China, mainland
1990s 41.41 kg/ha 11.77 kg/ha 29.65 kg/ha China, mainland
2000s 38.27 kg/ha 13.3 kg/ha 24.98 kg/ha China, mainland
2010s 43.65 kg/ha 15.35 kg/ha 28.29 kg/ha China, mainland
2020s 51.78 kg/ha 15.56 kg/ha 36.22 kg/ha China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, China, mainland or Small island developing states (SIDS)?
China, mainland, at 53.25 kg/ha against 16.06 kg/ha in Small island developing states (SIDS) as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between China, mainland and Small island developing states (SIDS)?
37.19 kg/ha, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Small island developing states (SIDS)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, mainland and Small island developing states (SIDS) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
China, mainland ranks 25th and Small island developing states (SIDS) ranks 11th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/china-mainland/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/china-mainland/small-island-developing-states-sids/">China, mainland vs Small island developing states (SIDS): Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).