China vs Russian Federation: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- China
- Russian Federation
How they compare
China currently reports 53.1 kg/ha against 52.24 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.86 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was China ahead.
China ranks 26th and Russian Federation ranks 27th of 186 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.23 kg/ha | 26.75 kg/ha | 14.48 kg/ha | China |
| 2000s | 38.25 kg/ha | 28.26 kg/ha | 9.99 kg/ha | China |
| 2010s | 43.58 kg/ha | 34.42 kg/ha | 9.16 kg/ha | China |
| 2020s | 51.64 kg/ha | 49.01 kg/ha | 2.64 kg/ha | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, China or Russian Federation?
- China, at 53.1 kg/ha against 52.24 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between China and Russian Federation?
- 0.86 kg/ha, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China and Russian Federation rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- China ranks 26th and Russian Federation ranks 27th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).