Cuba vs Spain: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Spain
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 16.89 kg/ha against 16.86 kg/ha in Spain, a difference of 0.03 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.
Cuba ranks 106th and Spain ranks 107th of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.43 kg/ha | 15.89 kg/ha | 5.47 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1970s | 14.25 kg/ha | 19.42 kg/ha | 5.17 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1980s | 17.02 kg/ha | 22.09 kg/ha | 5.07 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1990s | 12.91 kg/ha | 21.95 kg/ha | 9.04 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 15.99 kg/ha | 23.77 kg/ha | 7.78 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 18.51 kg/ha | 25.07 kg/ha | 6.56 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 16.36 kg/ha | 27.97 kg/ha | 11.61 kg/ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Spain?
- Cuba, at 16.89 kg/ha against 16.86 kg/ha in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Spain?
- 0.03 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Spain rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 106th and Spain ranks 107th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).