Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Democratic Republic of the Congo
5.47 kg/ha
in 2023
Micronesia (Federated States of)
1.29 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
16th
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
18th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
2468196119922023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 5.47 kg/ha against 1.29 kg/ha in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 4.18 kg/ha.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 4.2 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 16th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th of 18 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 3 and Micronesia (Federated States of) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Micronesia (Federated States of) Difference Ahead
1990s 4.04 kg/ha 4.59 kg/ha 0.5542 kg/ha Micronesia (Federated States of)
2000s 4.58 kg/ha 1.31 kg/ha 3.27 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 5.55 kg/ha 1.26 kg/ha 4.29 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 5.54 kg/ha 1.27 kg/ha 4.26 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 5.47 kg/ha against 1.29 kg/ha in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
4.18 kg/ha, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 16th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/micronesia-federated-states-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/micronesia-federated-states-of/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).