Dominican Republic vs USSR: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Dominican Republic
- USSR
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 29.48 kg/ha against 28.8 kg/ha in USSR, a difference of 0.68 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was USSR ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 61st and USSR ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.78 kg/ha | 21.48 kg/ha | 3.7 kg/ha | USSR |
| 1970s | 18.6 kg/ha | 27.79 kg/ha | 9.19 kg/ha | USSR |
| 1980s | 19.1 kg/ha | 29.38 kg/ha | 10.29 kg/ha | USSR |
| 1990s | 15.53 kg/ha | 33.15 kg/ha | 17.61 kg/ha | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Dominican Republic or USSR?
- Dominican Republic, at 29.48 kg/ha against 28.8 kg/ha in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Dominican Republic and USSR?
- 0.68 kg/ha, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Dominican Republic and USSR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Dominican Republic ranks 61st and USSR ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).