Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 34.09 kg/ha against 33.36 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.73 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 49th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.84 kg/ha | 32.35 kg/ha | 14.51 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 19.45 kg/ha | 36.57 kg/ha | 17.11 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 24.34 kg/ha | 34.9 kg/ha | 10.56 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 30.68 kg/ha | 34.61 kg/ha | 3.92 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 34.09 kg/ha against 33.36 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.73 kg/ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 49th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).