Ecuador vs Lithuania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 35.84 kg/ha against 34.09 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 1.75 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 53rd and Lithuania ranks 50th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.84 kg/ha | 17.17 kg/ha | 0.6623 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 19.45 kg/ha | 22.96 kg/ha | 3.51 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 24.34 kg/ha | 30.95 kg/ha | 6.6 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 30.68 kg/ha | 36.61 kg/ha | 5.92 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Ecuador or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 35.84 kg/ha against 34.09 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Ecuador and Lithuania?
- 1.75 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Lithuania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 53rd and Lithuania ranks 50th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).