Eritrea vs Sierra Leone: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 12.84 kg/ha against 12.72 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Eritrea ranks 119th and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.53 kg/ha | 11.02 kg/ha | 0.5037 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 10.64 kg/ha | 10.65 kg/ha | 0.0106 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 12.63 kg/ha | 12.73 kg/ha | 0.1011 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 12.72 kg/ha | 14.72 kg/ha | 2 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 12.84 kg/ha against 12.72 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Sierra Leone?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sierra Leone?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Sierra Leone rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 119th and Sierra Leone ranks 118th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).