Eritrea vs Togo: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Togo
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 12.72 kg/ha against 11.81 kg/ha in Togo, a difference of 0.91 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Togo ahead.
Eritrea ranks 119th and Togo ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.53 kg/ha | 10.22 kg/ha | 1.31 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 10.64 kg/ha | 12.04 kg/ha | 1.4 kg/ha | Togo |
| 2010s | 12.63 kg/ha | 11.86 kg/ha | 0.7749 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 12.72 kg/ha | 11.71 kg/ha | 1.01 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Togo?
- Eritrea, at 12.72 kg/ha against 11.81 kg/ha in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Togo?
- 0.91 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Togo?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Togo rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 119th and Togo ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).