Estonia vs Lebanon: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 14.2 kg/ha against 13.98 kg/ha in Lebanon, a difference of 0.22 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lebanon ahead.
Estonia ranks 109th and Lebanon ranks 111th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.41 kg/ha | 14.85 kg/ha | 1.44 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 7.82 kg/ha | 15.48 kg/ha | 7.66 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 7.64 kg/ha | 16.14 kg/ha | 8.5 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 14.69 kg/ha | 14.67 kg/ha | 0.0232 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Estonia or Lebanon?
- Estonia, at 14.2 kg/ha against 13.98 kg/ha in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Estonia and Lebanon?
- 0.22 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lebanon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Lebanon rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 109th and Lebanon ranks 111th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).