Estonia vs Panama: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 15.26 kg/ha against 14.2 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 1.06 kg/ha.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Panama ahead.
Estonia ranks 109th and Panama ranks 106th of 186 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.41 kg/ha | 17.64 kg/ha | 4.23 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2000s | 7.82 kg/ha | 15.63 kg/ha | 7.81 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2010s | 7.64 kg/ha | 14.08 kg/ha | 6.44 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2020s | 14.69 kg/ha | 15.17 kg/ha | 0.4777 kg/ha | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Estonia or Panama?
- Panama, at 15.26 kg/ha against 14.2 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Estonia and Panama?
- 1.06 kg/ha, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Panama?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Panama rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 109th and Panama ranks 106th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).