Ethiopia PDR vs Fiji: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Fiji
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 13.75 kg/ha against 13.26 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 0.49 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 114th and Fiji ranks 116th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.89 kg/ha | 9.98 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1970s | 10.69 kg/ha | 11.32 kg/ha | 0.6251 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 1980s | 14.31 kg/ha | 9.3 kg/ha | 5.01 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 14.94 kg/ha | 6.72 kg/ha | 8.22 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Fiji?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 13.75 kg/ha against 13.26 kg/ha in Fiji as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Fiji?
- 0.49 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Fiji?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Fiji rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 114th and Fiji ranks 116th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).