Ethiopia PDR vs Nigeria: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 13.87 kg/ha against 13.75 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 114th and Nigeria ranks 112th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.89 kg/ha | 6.26 kg/ha | 2.63 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 10.69 kg/ha | 7.02 kg/ha | 3.67 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 14.31 kg/ha | 10.03 kg/ha | 4.28 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 14.94 kg/ha | 10.44 kg/ha | 4.5 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 13.87 kg/ha against 13.75 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Nigeria?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Nigeria?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Nigeria rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 114th and Nigeria ranks 112th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).