Ethiopia PDR vs Qatar: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 13.81 kg/ha against 13.75 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 114th and Qatar ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.89 kg/ha | 13.3 kg/ha | 4.41 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1970s | 10.69 kg/ha | 21.06 kg/ha | 10.37 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1980s | 14.31 kg/ha | 8.77 kg/ha | 5.54 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 14.94 kg/ha | 11.02 kg/ha | 3.92 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 13.81 kg/ha against 13.75 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Qatar?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Qatar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Qatar rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 114th and Qatar ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).