France vs Tajikistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- France
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 64.34 kg/ha against 61 kg/ha in France, a difference of 3.34 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times France's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was France ahead.
France ranks 18th and Tajikistan ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, France averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.92 kg/ha | 29.8 kg/ha | 20.11 kg/ha | France |
| 2000s | 51.35 kg/ha | 41.34 kg/ha | 10.01 kg/ha | France |
| 2010s | 54.65 kg/ha | 54.4 kg/ha | 0.246 kg/ha | France |
| 2020s | 57 kg/ha | 62.83 kg/ha | 5.83 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, France or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 64.34 kg/ha against 61 kg/ha in France as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between France and Tajikistan?
- 3.34 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do France and Tajikistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- France ranks 18th and Tajikistan ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).