Georgia vs Togo: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Togo
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 12.54 kg/ha against 11.81 kg/ha in Togo, a difference of 0.73 kg/ha.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 120th and Togo ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.97 kg/ha | 10.17 kg/ha | 0.7967 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 11.81 kg/ha | 12.04 kg/ha | 0.2289 kg/ha | Togo |
| 2010s | 11.42 kg/ha | 11.86 kg/ha | 0.4398 kg/ha | Togo |
| 2020s | 12.14 kg/ha | 11.71 kg/ha | 0.4332 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Togo?
- Georgia, at 12.54 kg/ha against 11.81 kg/ha in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Togo?
- 0.73 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Togo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Togo rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 120th and Togo ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).