Haiti vs Lesotho: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 9.29 kg/ha against 9.02 kg/ha in Haiti, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 134th and Lesotho ranks 131st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 6 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | 5.5 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1970s | 11.01 kg/ha | 7.42 kg/ha | 3.59 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1980s | 10.09 kg/ha | 8.48 kg/ha | 1.62 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1990s | 9.75 kg/ha | 11.19 kg/ha | 1.44 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 9.27 kg/ha | 7.02 kg/ha | 2.25 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2010s | 8.58 kg/ha | 8.42 kg/ha | 0.1675 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2020s | 8.81 kg/ha | 8.53 kg/ha | 0.2807 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Haiti or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 9.29 kg/ha against 9.02 kg/ha in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Haiti and Lesotho?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Lesotho rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 134th and Lesotho ranks 131st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).