Iceland vs Kenya: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Iceland
- Kenya
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 20.11 kg/ha against 19.89 kg/ha in Kenya, a difference of 0.22 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.
Iceland ranks 86th and Kenya ranks 89th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.34 kg/ha | 12.06 kg/ha | 3.73 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1970s | 5.86 kg/ha | 13.02 kg/ha | 7.16 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1980s | 8.1 kg/ha | 15.47 kg/ha | 7.37 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1990s | 7.23 kg/ha | 14.54 kg/ha | 7.31 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 9.68 kg/ha | 15.01 kg/ha | 5.34 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 17.02 kg/ha | 16.51 kg/ha | 0.5067 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2020s | 26.24 kg/ha | 18.32 kg/ha | 7.92 kg/ha | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Iceland or Kenya?
- Iceland, at 20.11 kg/ha against 19.89 kg/ha in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Iceland and Kenya?
- 0.22 kg/ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Kenya rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Iceland ranks 86th and Kenya ranks 89th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).