Iraq vs Japan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Iraq
- Japan
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 34.1 kg/ha against 33.96 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Iraq ranks 48th and Japan ranks 50th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.96 kg/ha | 76.85 kg/ha | 66.89 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 10.78 kg/ha | 80.73 kg/ha | 69.95 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1980s | 9.24 kg/ha | 52.89 kg/ha | 43.66 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1990s | 9.49 kg/ha | 38.56 kg/ha | 29.07 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 16.27 kg/ha | 35.31 kg/ha | 19.04 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 34.25 kg/ha | 33.44 kg/ha | 0.8116 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 2020s | 34.86 kg/ha | 34.43 kg/ha | 0.4329 kg/ha | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Iraq or Japan?
- Iraq, at 34.1 kg/ha against 33.96 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Iraq and Japan?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Japan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Iraq ranks 48th and Japan ranks 50th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).